The Ohio class ballistic submarines replacements are currently projected to cost $93 billion and are expected to be operational by 2030. This soaring submarines replacements costs may be eating so much of the budget that it threatens other US Navy programs. US military spending is causing headaches in Congress once again. “I’m concerned about the Ohio class replacement,” said House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Tex., adding that the costs could “crowd out all other shipbuilding in the Navy. We have other shipbuilding needs.”
The Ohio class replacements are designed to be high-tech and stealthy, quietly cruising the seas, providing second strike capability – an essential element of nuclear deterrence – and nuclear retaliation capability. The subs are 560 feet long and house 16 Trident II D5 missiles, which are fired from 44-foot-long tubes. The lead ship in the fleet of 12 is expected to cost $12.4 billion, but that includes an estimated $4.8 billion in initial engineering and development costs that shouldn’t, in theory, recur in the 11 subsequent submarines, which the Pentagon hopes to build for $4.9 billion each.
Shell Game or Smart Savings Plan?
In 2014, Congress created the “National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund” – a separate fund dedicated to the submarine program, to keep costs from eating into the general Navy budget. If the funds for the Ohio replacements were put under the Navy’s normal shipbuilding budget “it would have devastated the Navy’s overall long-term plans for the fleet,” according to DoDBuzz. The backers of the separate fund claim that a project as big as nuclear attack-deterrent submarines counts as a “national asset” and should therefore come out of the wider defense budget.
Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va.denied criticisms that the fund was a “shell game,” maintaining that it was a mechanism whereby funds unused elsewhere could be saved up for this very big, very significant project. “This is such an important once-in-a-generation kind of acquisition…. we’d better start saving for it now,” he said, comparing the fund to a Christmas savings account. “I’m not going to wait for the night before Christmas to put in the money.”……
See full story on spacewar.com
Image courtesy of spacewar.com